Headache in Patients with Sellar Disease: Clinicomorphological Predictors of Headache and the Outcome of Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery.

Objectives Sellar pathologies are frequently found on imaging performed to investigate headache. However, both headache and incidental sellar lesions are common. Hence, this study prospectively examined headache prevalence, phenotype, and severity in patients with sellar pathologies and the impact of transsphenoidal surgery on headache. Methods Patients undergoing transsphenoidal resection of sellar lesions were consecutively recruited. At baseline, participants were defined as having headache or not and headache phenotype was characterized using validated questionnaires. Headache severity was assessed at baseline and 6 months postoperatively using the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) and Migraine Disability Assessment Score (MIDAS). Tumor characteristics were defined using radiological, histological, and endocrine factors. Primary outcomes included baseline headache prevalence and severity and headache severity change at 6 months postoperatively. Correlation between headache and radiological, histological, and endocrine characteristics was also of interest. Results Sixty participants (62% female, 47.1 ± 18.6 years) were recruited. Sixty-three percent possessed baseline headache. HIT-6 scores were higher in patients with primary headache risk factors, including younger age (R 2 = -0.417, p = 0.010), smoking history (63.31 ± 7.93 vs 54.44 ± 9.21, p = 0.0060), and family headache history (68.13 ± 7.01 vs 54.94 ± 9.11, p = 0.0030). Headaches were more common in patients with dural invasion (55.70 ± 12.14 vs 47.18 ± 10.15, p = 0.027) and sphenoid sinus invasion (58.87 ± 8.97 vs 51.29 ± 10.97, p = 0.007). Postoperative severity scores improved more with higher baseline headache severity (HIT-6: R 2 = -0.682, p < 0.001, MIDAS: R 2 = -0.880, p < 0.0010) and dural invasion (MIDAS: -53.00 ± 18.68 vs 12.00 ± 17.54, p = 0.0030). Conclusion Headaches in sellar disease are likely primary disorders triggered or exacerbated by sellar pathology. These may respond to surgery, particularly in patients with severe headache and dural invasion.

Prevalence, types, and characteristics of headache in Behcets disease without involvement of the central nervous system in the Syrian population: a case-cohort study.

Introduction: Oral ulcers, genital ulcers, and uveitis represent the typical trial of Behcet's disease (BD). It is well common on the Old Silk Road. The mucocutaneous lesions are the hallmark of BD, but neurological involvement is one of the severe symptoms. Headaches may be an early sign of BD neurological involvement. This study aims to investigate the headache prevalence and its types, and characteristics in a Syrian sample of BD patients. Methods: BD patients were clinically interviewed and examined to collect their information, symptoms, and signs. the International Study Group for Behcet's Disease diagnosis criteria was used to confirm the BD diagnosis. The International Classification of headaches was used when classifying the headaches. Results: One hundred twenty participants were included in the study. half of them were BD patients and the control group was also 60 participants. Among Syrian BD patients, 36.7% suffer from primary headaches and 36.7% suffer from secondary headaches. These findings were not significantly different between the BD patients and the healthy population. Our results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: Headache should not be considered a predictor for neurological involvement among BD patients. Additional attention to BD patients or the specific treatment for headaches is not required and does not differ from the general population.

The effect of anesthetic blockade of greater occipital nerve during the withdrawal period of the medication overuse headache treatment.

Background and purpose:

Discontinua­tion of medication still remains a key element in the treatment of medication overuse headache (MOH), but there is no consensus on the withdrawal procedure. We aimed to share the promising results of anesthetic blockade of greater occipital nerve (GON), which can be an alternative to existing treatments during the early withdrawal period of MOH treatment.

This study was conducted using regular electronic medical records and headache diaries of patients diagnosed with MOH and treated with anesthetic GON blockade with 0.5% bupivacaine solution in a specia­lized headache outpatient clinic. A total of 86 patients who developed MOH while being followed up for chronic migraine were included in the study.

The treatment schemes for MOH are based on expert consensus and withdrawal strategies are the most challenging part of treatment. In our study, numerical rating scale for headache intensity, overused medication consumption per month, headache frequency (day/month) and the duration of each attack (hour/day) decreased significantly in the first month compared to pre-treatment (p < 0.01). 

Conclusion – Our study suggests that GON blockade can be used as a good alternative therapy in the treatment of MOH.

Headache Attributed to a Substance or Its Withdrawal.

Identification of substances that may cause or trigger headache is important to start effective treatment early to prevent unnecessary suffering, deterioration in quality of life, and the development of chronic pain. Treatment in case of medication overuse and other chronic headache should be decisive and effective. Drug withdrawal and introduction of effective prophylactic medication for the underlying headache disorder should be the primary treatment strategy. Typical headache-inducing substances are nitric oxide, phosphodiesterase, cocaine, alcohol, histamine, carbon oxide, and calcitonin gene-related peptide. The withdrawal of caffeine, estrogen, and opioids is most often associated with the development of headache.

Frequency and predictors of headache in the first 12 months after traumatic brain injury: results from CENTER-TBI.

BACKGROUND: Headache is a prevalent and debilitating symptom following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Large-scale, prospective cohort studies are needed to establish long-term headache prevalence and associated factors after TBI. This study aimed to assess the frequency and severity of headache after TBI and determine whether sociodemographic factors, injury severity characteristics, and pre- and post-injury comorbidities predicted changes in headache frequency and severity during the first 12 months after injury. METHODS: A large patient sample from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) prospective observational cohort study was used. Patients were stratified based on their clinical care pathway: admitted to an emergency room (ER), a ward (ADM) or an intensive care unit (ICU) in the acute phase. Headache was assessed using a single item from the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire measured at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months after injury. Mixed-effect logistic regression analyses were applied to investigate changes in headache frequency and associated predictors. RESULTS: A total of 2,291 patients responded to the headache item at baseline. At study enrolment, 59.3% of patients reported acute headache, with similar frequencies across all strata. Female patients and those aged up to 40 years reported a higher frequency of headache at baseline compared to males and older adults. The frequency of severe headache was highest in patients admitted to the ICU. The frequency of headache in the ER stratum decreased substantially from baseline to 3 months and remained from 3 to 6 months. Similar trajectory trends were observed in the ICU and ADM strata across 12 months. Younger age, more severe TBI, fatigue, neck pain and vision problems were among the predictors of more severe headache over time. More than 25% of patients experienced headache at 12 months after injury. CONCLUSIONS: Headache is a common symptom after TBI, especially in female and younger patients. It typically decreases in the first 3 months before stabilising. However, more than a quarter of patients still experienced headache at 12 months after injury. Translational research is needed to advance the clinical decision-making process and improve targeted medical treatment for headache. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02210221.

A case report: new-onset nummular headache after stenting of the middle cerebral artery.

BACKGROUND: Nummular headache (NH) is categorized as a primary headache in the International Classification of Headache Disorders, Third edition (ICHD-3) diagnostic criteria, but there are secondary etiologies as well. We present a case of secondary NH that associated with vascular lesion. CASE PRESENTATION: We report on a 40-year-old man with a medical history of symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis who developed a headache after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting because of Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis(ICAS). This new-onset headache was a pinprick headache confined to the parietal part of the head and 5 cm in size. This headache most closely resembled the phenotype of a NH. And other causes of secondary headache were excluded. Thus, the diagnosis of NH was highly speculated. This patient represents a rare headache phenomenon after intracranial arterial stent placement. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of NH after stent placement treatment in a patient with ICAS.

Status migrainosus.

Status migrainosus is one of the recognized complications of migraine with or without aura, defined as a persistent debilitating migraine attack lasting for more than 72h with little reprieve, leading to functional disability. The individual impact of status migrainosus and the substantial healthcare burden are highlighted. Current case series which inform our understanding of this condition are examined with two groups emergent, those with classic status migrainosus and those with episodic status migrainosus. The question as to whether status migrainosus is a distinct biological state beyond the established migraine pathophysiology is examined. With the underlying pathophysiology not fully understood, attention is turned to therapeutic considerations and the available evidence informing practice. A practical approach to treatment of status migrainosus is presented. Given the severity and need for emergency care, options detailed are in line with recommendations for acute migraine care: with a staged approach initially combining subcutaneous sumatriptan with parenteral options including dopamine receptor antagonists, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories and acetaminophen. The place of combination treatment with parenteral magnesium sulfate, dihydroergotamine, antiepileptics, corticosteroids, and anesthetic agents is outlined. With a paucity of high-quality evidence to consolidate current clinical approaches, consideration of future therapies and research questions is raised.

Proposed general diagnostic criteria for secondary headaches.

BACKGROUND: The distinction between a pre-existing primary headache and a secondary headache at the onset of a disorder is important and has not been taken into account in the International Classification of Headache Disorders-3. This study aimed to improve the general diagnostic criteria for secondary headaches using results of our previous studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed characteristics of headaches including their changes in intensity, duration, frequency, localization and side, development of new accompanying symptoms, and therapeutic response at the onset of transient ischemic attacks (TIA) (n = 120, mean age 56.1, 55% females) and ischemic stroke (n = 550, mean age 63.1, 56% females) compared to the control group (n = 192, mean age 58.7, 64% females). RESULTS: Headache of a new type occurred in 8.4% of ischemic stroke patients and 5% of TIA patients on the day of admission but did not occur at all in the control group. Pre-existing headache with a change of at least one characteristic occurred significantly more often in stroke (5.4%) and TIA (7.5%) than in the control group (1%) (p = 0.01 and p = 0.003 respectively). CONCLUSION: The presence of a new type of headache and a pre-existing headache with altered characteristics in close temporal relation to a disorder indicates causality. Based on these data we propose revised general diagnostic criteria for secondary headaches.

Evaluation of the ICHD-3 diagnostic criteria for cardiac cephalalgia and new proposal.

BACKGROUND: The current International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3) diagnostic criteria for cardiac cephalalgia were established according to previous case reports and the opinion of experts. We aimed to assess the ICHD-3 diagnostic criteria for cardiac cephalalgia. METHODS: We conducted a series of cases study and evaluated these criteria in 54 patients with cardiac cephalalgia. Next, we assessed whether the ICHD-3 diagnostic criteria B, C and D for migraine without aura were fulfilled by these patients. RESULTS: ICHD-3 criteria A, B, C1, C2 and D for cardiac cephalalgia were met by 100% of patients, whereas criterion C3 was fulfilled by 81.5%. The least frequently fulfilled sub-criterion was C3b (accompanied by nausea) (18.5%). Moreover, we found that ICHD-3 criteria B, C and D for migraine without aura were met by a low proportion of patients: 11.1%, 46.3% and 25.9%, respectively, and no patient fulfilled the three criteria simultaneously. CONCLUSION: Based on our results, we propose revised diagnostic criteria for cardiac cephalalgia. We suggest removing criterion C3 and C4. We also suggest removing the word "migraine-like" from its description.

Secondary headaches in pregnancy and the puerperium.

Headache during pregnancy can be due to primary causes such as migraine but can also be a presenting symptom of secondary causes including life threatening conditions. This is a minireview of secondary causes of headache during pregnancy and the puerperium. Unique alterations in physiological and vascular functions as well as in the coagulation pathway which occur during pregnancy increase the risk of most of these secondary conditions which include preeclampsia, eclampsia, hemorrhagic stroke, cerebral venous, sinus thrombosis, reversible cerebral vascular syndrome, and posterior reversible encephalopathy. Marked increase in progesterone level in pregnancy is also associated with the growth of tumors such as meningiomas, as 70% of these tumors are positive for progesterone receptors and increase in size can lead to headache along with other neurological symptoms. Hemodynamic changes can lead to the growth of meningiomas as well. Although hormone producing pituitary tumors are usually not conducing to pregnancy, women with known pituitary tumors who do get pregnant may become symptomatic during pregnancy and develop secondary headache. Another rare cause of secondary headache during pregnancy is pituitary apoplexy. Although its occurrence is uncommon, it needs to be properly recognized and treated to avoid endocrine and visual complications. Other rare entities with increased incidence during the puerperium such postdural puncture headache will be also discussed. In summary, new onset headache during pregnancy deserves special attention because in the absence of proper recognition and treatment, secondary headache disorders can endanger the life of the mother and the fetus.

Medication-overuse headache-a review of different treatment strategies.

Medication-overuse headache (MOH) can develop from primary headaches. MOH is usually the result of overuse of symptomatic medications. It is a noteworthy personal and societal burden. The identification and treatment of patients at risk for MOH is an essential component of MOH management. Medication overuse can be modifiable and can advance from episodic to chronic migraine. Treatment for MOH is complex, and experts in the field have varied views on the most appropriate strategy for MOH treatment. The objective of this review is to give a comprehensive synopsis of the literature for the management of MOH. Treatment strategies, such as detoxification and prevention, are the debatable issues. Medication withdrawal is the foundation for management. The available literature suggested abrupt withdrawal with preventive approaches for early management. Bridging therapy could be useful to get relief from withdrawal symptoms. Multidisciplinary choices proved beneficial in supporting withdrawal and preventing relapse. Worldwide, the termination of overused medications has been observed as a standard treatment strategy; however, patient-specific approaches should be taken.

Secondary headache disorders in Turkey, the Middle East, Asia, and Africa: A cross-sectional, multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: This multicenter cross-sectional study aimed to determine the frequency and characteristics of secondary headaches in different geographic regions, including Turkey, the Middle East, Asia, and Africa. METHODS: Patients were admitted to the study on a particular day each week for five consecutive weeks between 1 April and 16 May 2022. Before the study, all researchers underwent a constructed briefing about the use and code of the ICHD-3 criteria. The study was conducted in two stages. In the first stage, data on secondary headaches were compared between the regions. In the second stage, the sub-diagnoses of secondary headaches were analyzed only in Turkey. RESULTS: A total of 4144 (30.0%) of the 13,794 patients reported headaches as the main symptoms at admission. A total of 422 patients were excluded from the study. In total, 1249 (33.4%) of 3722 patients were diagnosed as having secondary headaches (Turkey [n = 1039], Middle East [n = 80], Asia [n = 51], Africa [n = 79]). The frequency of secondary headaches (Turkey 33.6%, Africa 30.1%, Middle East 35.5%, Asia 35.4%) did not differ significantly between the regions (p > 0.05). The most common subtype of secondary headaches was headache attributed to substances or their withdrawal in all the studied regions. There was a female predominance in all regions, but it was lower in Africa than in Turkey. The severity and density of headaches differed significantly between the regions, with patients from Africa reporting milder pain than patients from other regions. In Turkey, the most common sub-diagnoses of secondary headaches were medication overuse headache, idiopathic intracranial hypertension, and cervicogenic headache. CONCLUSION: In the present study, one in three patients with a headache had a secondary headache. Headache attributed to substances or their withdrawal was the most common subtype of secondary headaches in all the studied regions. The female predominance of secondary headaches was lower in Africa than in Turkey. The severity and density of headaches differed significantly between regions, with patients from Africa reporting milder pain.

Secondary headaches - red and green flags and their significance for diagnostics.

A small percentage of patients suffer from a secondary headache syndrome. It is imperative that clinicians are able to differentiate primary headache syndromes from secondary headache syndromes, as failure to do so significantly worsens morbidity and mortality. Recent advances in our understanding of pathobiological mechanisms offer useful information on these enigmatic disorders. We now understand that the causes of secondary headache syndromes can vary significantly - these may be infectious, inflammatory, vascular, traumatic or structural in origin. A well-taken history and targeted physical examination coupled with appropriate investigations can enable these syndromes to be recognized consistently and thus allow their timely and appropriate treatment. Along with their epidemiology, some of their key characteristics shall thus be discussed in this review so as to aid the busy clinician at the bedside. Red flags including sudden onset, high pain intensity, pattern of change of a preexisting headache, focal neurological signs or seizure, systemic signs and precipitation by physical activity can guide the clinician to suspect a secondary headache. Importantly a preexisting headache is not an exclusion of a secondary headache - it might even be a predisposition in certain cases.

Headache and systemic lupus erythematosus: A narrative review.

OBJECTIVE: To review the epidemiology, the differential diagnosis, and the clinical and laboratory factors associated with the care management of headaches in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). BACKGROUND: SLE is a chronic autoimmune disease and in 12%-95% of patients, the nervous system is involved. Headache is a frequently reported, although nonspecific, symptom that may potentially represent serious underlying diagnoses. Primary headaches may also occur in these patients, thereby causing a negative and significant impact on their quality of life. METHODS: This is a narrative review. A literature review was conducted on the PubMed platform using the following terms: (1) headache and (2) lupus. All articles considered relevant were included. No limitations were imposed for the publication date. RESULTS: Headache is a frequent symptom in patients with SLE. Although its prevalence is similar to the general population, headaches nonetheless tend to have a greater negative impact on these patients. Patients with SLE are more likely to experience headache due to vascular diseases such as cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, stroke, reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, and vasculitis. Aseptic meningitis, neuroinfections, intracranial neoplasms, and intracranial hypertension or hypotension may also be a cause of headache in these patients. Although used in disease activity scores, the concept of lupus headache is controversial. CONCLUSIONS: Headache is a frequent symptom in patients with SLE. An appropriate approach enables the potentially serious conditions, which are the causes of secondary headaches, to be recognized and treated, together with an appropriate diagnosis and treatment of primary headaches.

Prevalence, clinical characteristics and associated factors of cardiac cephalalgia: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of cardiac cephalalgia is unknown and there is limited information about its clinical features. We aimed to assess the prevalence of cardiac cephalalgia, its clinical characteristics and associated factors. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome admitted to the Cardiology Service at Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain, over a one-year period. We interviewed patients within the first 24 hours of admission using a standardized case-report form to assess the presence of headache in relation to the acute coronary syndrome and its characteristics. RESULTS: We included 438 patients, 381 with confirmed myocardial ischemia. Prevalence of cardiac cephalalgia was 14.2% (n = 54). The most common features were frontal location, pressing quality and moderate intensity. Pain referred to the jaws (aOR 2.61; 95% CI 1.33-5.12; p = 0.005), palpitations (aOR 3.65; 95% CI 1.57-8.50; p = 0.003) and circumflex coronary artery as the culprit artery for the myocardial ischemia (aOR 3.8; 95% CI 1.07-13.74; p = 0.021) were related to cardiac whereas history of hypertension was inversely associated (aOR 0.37: 95% CI 0.18-0.74; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of cardiac cephalalgia was 14.2%. Our study provides valuable information about cardiac cephalalgia characteristics that suggest revision of current diagnostic criteria.

Combined Invasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in the Management of Chronic Post-Intracranial Disorder Headache: A Case Report.

The introduction of ventricular shunts dramatically changed the outcome and quality of life of hydrocephalic patients. However, shunt surgery continues to be associated with numerous adverse events. Headache is one of the most common complications after shunt operation. It is often of prolonged duration, the symptoms resemble those of migraine, and pain does not respond to medication. We propose invasive peripheral nerve stimulation as a potential solution in the treatment of patients suffering from chronic headache associated with shunted hydrocephalus. A young woman presented with daily holocephalic headache with diffuse pain exacerbated by lying down. Imaging revealed panventricular enlargement and possible aqueduct stenosis. When a ventriculoperitoneal shunt was placed, clinical symptoms resolved. Nevertheless, she gradually exacerbated after a second valve replacement due to wound infection. Imaging revealed decompressed ventricles and appropriate shunt placement. The diagnosis of chronic post-intracranial disorder headache was set. Therefore, occipital nerve stimulation was applied and, considering that the patient did not have a total response, bilateral parietal stimulation was added. Three months after the combined PNS, she experienced total remission of headache. Combined PNS eases refractory headaches much more than occipital nerve stimulation alone and could be considered as a solution for shunted hydrocephalus-associated headache.

Persistent headache attributed to past cervicocephalic artery dissection: clinical characteristics and contributors to headache persistence.

BACKGROUND: Persistent headache/facial/neck pain attributed to past cervicocephalic arterial dissection is under-documented in literature. Our main goal was to evaluate clinical characteristics and contributors to this persistence. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study which included patients with a radiologically confirmed cervicocephalic arterial dissection (2015-2020) in a Portuguese tertiary hospital. Headache persistence was identified through clinical records. A questionnaire aimed to characterize headache in three moments: previous, persistent, and headache at the time of the interview (on average 2.5 years post-event). RESULTS: Ninety-two patients were identified; 24 (26.1%) had headache persistence ≥3 months, and 20 (22.2%) on average after 2.5 years post-event. There were no differences regarding demographics and vascular risk factors among patients with (n = 22) and without (n = 68) headache persistence. The first group had higher previous headache history (68.2% vs 4.4%, p < 0.001), delay in diagnosis (3.6 vs 1.9 days, p < 0.001), and headache/cervicalgia as the first symptom (81.8% vs 41.2%, p < 0.001). At the time of the interview, 20% still reported daily headache. A logistic regression model depicted headache history (OR = 59.8, p < 0.001), acute headache/cervicalgia (odds ratio, OR = 25.4, p = 0.005), posterior circulation dissection (OR = 7.6, p < 0.001), and less than 4 points by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (OR = 5.0, p = 0.025) as contributors to headache persistence. CONCLUSION: Headache persistence post-cervicocephalic arterial dissection is common, and frequently affects patients daily. As it potentially affects functional outcomes and quality of life, the contributors identified in this study may help clinicians manage patients after the acute event.

Comparison between Simple Planas Indirect Tracks and occlusal splints for treatment of temporomandibular disorder-related headache: a randomized controlled clinical trial / Comparação entre Pistas Indiretas Planas Simples e placas miorrelaxantes para tratamento de dor de cabeça relacionada à disfunção temporomandibular: ensaio clínico randomizado

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Temporomandibular disorder-related headache (TMDH) is a very common clinical condition which manifests as pain around the temples. The treatment recommended in dentistry is occlusal splint. However, there is a device generally used in functional jaw orthopedics, called simple Planas indirect tracks (SPIT), which has been shown to be efficient in managing these headaches. This clinical trial aimed to compare SPIT and occlusal splints in the treatment of TMDH patients. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial included thirty-seven women who had TMDH for more than one year into three groups: GPIT treated with SPIT, GSPLINT treated with a Michigan splint, and a control group (CG) submitted to no treatment. The randomization was paired, that is, each new individual was assigned to a group sequentially. The number of headache days per month, average pain intensity, pain response to masseter and temporalis palpation, and days of pain drug use were collected and analyzed. The follow-up lasted for 3 months. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were included but 4 dropped out during treatment and 33 underwent intervention. Patients in GPIT exhibited superior results compared to GSPLINT and CG, with significant differences between groups for almost all variables. In GPIT, the number of headache days was reduced by 87.43%, pain intensity by 66.67%, and days of drug use by 88.42%, with significant improvement in all parameters compared to CG. In GSPLINT, the number of headache days decreased by 44.46% and days of drug use by 36.63%, while pain intensity increased by 46.67%; however, there was no significant difference in any of the parameters compared to CG. CONCLUSION: SPIT may be a good treatment option for patients with TMDH since these appliances have shown much more consistent results than occlusal splints. Further studies and with more individuals will be needed to confirm these findings.

RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A cefaleia secundária à disfunção temporomandibular (CDTM), é uma condição clínica muito comum, com dores nas têmporas. O tratamento padrão na odontologia são as placas miorrelaxantes, entretanto um aparelho da ortopedia funcional dos maxilares, chamado de Pistas Indiretas Planas Simples (PIPS), tem se demonstrado eficiente no controle dessas cefaleias. Este estudo clínico visou comparar as PIPS com as placas miorrelaxantes, no quadro álgico de CDTM. MÉTODOS: Este ensaio clínico randomizado incluiu 37 mulheres portadoras de CDTM há mais de um ano, que foram distribuídas aleatoriamente em três grupos: o GPIPS, no qual as pacientes foram tratadas com PIPS, o GPLACA, com uso de placas miorrelaxantes de Michigan e o grupo controle (GC), sem qualquer tratamento. A aleatorização foi pareada, sendo que cada participante era consecutivamente alocada em um grupo diferente. Foram coletados e analisados dias de cefaleia por mês, intensidade de dores, resposta álgica à palpação de masseter e temporal, bem como os dias de uso de fármacos. O acompanhamento foi de três meses. RESULTADOS: Das 37 pacientes iniciais, 4 desistiram do tratamento e apenas 33 foram submetidos a alguma intervenção. As pacientes do GPIPS apresentaram resultados muito superiores às do GPLACA e do GC, com diferenças significativas entre os grupos em quase todas as variáveis. No GPIPS, os dias de dor diminuíram 87,43%, a intensidade 66,67% e os dias de uso de fármacos analgésicos 88,42%, sendo estatisticamente significante a melhora em todos os parâmetros em relação ao GC. Já no GPLACA, os dias de dor diminuíram 44,46% e os dias de uso de fármacos 36,63%, mas a intensidade da dor aumentou 46,67%, porém sem diferença estatisticamente significante em nenhum parâmetro quando comparado ao GC. CONCLUSÃO: O uso do PIPS pode ser uma boa escolha de tratamento da CDTM, tendo apresentado resultados mais consistentes do que as placas miorrelaxantes. Mais estudos e com mais participantes são necessários para confirmar estes achados.